https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286673 Section 4 of Act VII of 1889 prevents a court from proceeding with execution at the instance of a person claiming entitlement to execute a decree unless a certificate or other like authority is produced, but it does not render the execution application itself invalid when the document is not filed at the time of presentation. The Calcutta HC noted that the certificate may be produced during the pendency of the proceedings, so the absence of simultaneous filing is not, by itself, fatal to the application. On that reasoning, an execution application by the legal representative of a deceased decree-holder remains good in law despite the initial omission. en-us Thu, 12 May 1892 00:00:00 +0521 Mon, 09 Mar 2020 14:37:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286673 Section 4 of Act VII of 1889 prevents a court from proceeding with execution at the instance of a person claiming entitlement to execute a decree unless a certificate or other like authority is produced, but it does not render the execution application itself invalid when the document is not filed at the time of presentation. The Calcutta HC noted that the certificate may be produced during the pendency of the proceedings, so the absence of simultaneous filing is not, by itself, fatal to the application. On that reasoning, an execution application by the legal representative of a deceased decree-holder remains good in law despite the initial omission. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 May 1892 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286673