<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 413 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286671</link>
    <description>Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 excludes time only where earlier proceedings were prosecuted with due diligence and in good faith; on the facts described, the record and affidavit were insufficient to establish either requirement, so limitation could not be extended. Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act applies only when an initially erroneous or defective transfer is later validated by the transferor&#039;s subsequent acquisition of title; it does not cure a transfer that was void or inoperative from the outset. On that reasoning, the later deed accepted by the competent authority prevailed, and the earlier claim based on the defective deed failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2020 12:38:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 413 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286671</link>
      <description>Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 excludes time only where earlier proceedings were prosecuted with due diligence and in good faith; on the facts described, the record and affidavit were insufficient to establish either requirement, so limitation could not be extended. Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act applies only when an initially erroneous or defective transfer is later validated by the transferor&#039;s subsequent acquisition of title; it does not cure a transfer that was void or inoperative from the outset. On that reasoning, the later deed accepted by the competent authority prevailed, and the earlier claim based on the defective deed failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>