<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (10) TMI 294 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286669</link>
    <description>Delay in filing a petition for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was refused condonation because the explanation based on administrative lapses and internal Government practices was found insufficient. The Court treated the importance of the proposed appeal and the amount involved as irrelevant to limitation, and noted that a certified copy of the judgment was not required with the leave petition on the Original Side. As the petition was filed beyond time without a proper explanation, the delay was not condoned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2020 12:27:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (10) TMI 294 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286669</link>
      <description>Delay in filing a petition for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was refused condonation because the explanation based on administrative lapses and internal Government practices was found insufficient. The Court treated the importance of the proposed appeal and the amount involved as irrelevant to limitation, and noted that a certified copy of the judgment was not required with the leave petition on the Original Side. As the petition was filed beyond time without a proper explanation, the delay was not condoned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>