<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1251 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286668</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the disallowance of charges under section 40(a)(ia) and the addition of mark to market losses in derivative transactions for A.Y. 2007-08. The Tribunal found that the charges were not &#039;fees for technical services&#039; and accepted the assessee&#039;s claim of loss as expenditure under section 37(1). The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as it failed to provide contrary evidence, with grounds 3 and 4 considered general and not independently assessed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2020 10:54:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1251 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286668</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the disallowance of charges under section 40(a)(ia) and the addition of mark to market losses in derivative transactions for A.Y. 2007-08. The Tribunal found that the charges were not &#039;fees for technical services&#039; and accepted the assessee&#039;s claim of loss as expenditure under section 37(1). The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as it failed to provide contrary evidence, with grounds 3 and 4 considered general and not independently assessed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>