<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 407 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393263</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the transporter, whose goods were intercepted without an e-way bill and faced penalties, to approach the newly notified Appellate Authority within three weeks. Compliance within the given period would consider the time spent before the High Court, allowing the appeal to be treated as filed within the stipulated time. The Court concluded the writ application by instructing the petitioner to pursue the appeal process before the Appellate Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 407 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393263</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the transporter, whose goods were intercepted without an e-way bill and faced penalties, to approach the newly notified Appellate Authority within three weeks. Compliance within the given period would consider the time spent before the High Court, allowing the appeal to be treated as filed within the stipulated time. The Court concluded the writ application by instructing the petitioner to pursue the appeal process before the Appellate Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>