<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 399 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393255</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed a procedural violation of Rule 46A(2) and (3) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, leading to the dismissal of the appeal/cross objection by the tribunal. The Court remanded the matter to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for a rehearing and redetermination of the appeal within four months, ensuring compliance with the rules. This decision aimed to rectify the procedural error and safeguard the rights of the parties involved in the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2020 08:43:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 399 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393255</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed a procedural violation of Rule 46A(2) and (3) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, leading to the dismissal of the appeal/cross objection by the tribunal. The Court remanded the matter to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for a rehearing and redetermination of the appeal within four months, ensuring compliance with the rules. This decision aimed to rectify the procedural error and safeguard the rights of the parties involved in the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>