<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 377 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393233</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellants, directing the respondents to pay interest on the refunded tax amount. Despite acknowledging the delay in filing the writ petitions, the Court emphasized the principle of equity in tax matters and held that interest should accompany the refund to ensure fairness and justice in resolving the tax dispute. The Court rejected the respondents&#039; argument based on the delay and emphasized that interest must be granted as the respondents did not challenge the refund order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 377 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393233</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellants, directing the respondents to pay interest on the refunded tax amount. Despite acknowledging the delay in filing the writ petitions, the Court emphasized the principle of equity in tax matters and held that interest should accompany the refund to ensure fairness and justice in resolving the tax dispute. The Court rejected the respondents&#039; argument based on the delay and emphasized that interest must be granted as the respondents did not challenge the refund order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>