<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1373 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286657</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions of Rs. 40,00,000/- under Section 68 and Rs. 1,00,000/- for commission. The Tribunal found the assessee had met its burden of proof, criticized the AO for relying on unverified information, and emphasized the need for individual shareholder assessments in suspected bogus transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2020 07:41:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1373 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286657</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions of Rs. 40,00,000/- under Section 68 and Rs. 1,00,000/- for commission. The Tribunal found the assessee had met its burden of proof, criticized the AO for relying on unverified information, and emphasized the need for individual shareholder assessments in suspected bogus transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>