<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 13 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21632</link>
    <description>A gratuity provision based on scientific or actuarial valuation is treated as an existing liability, not a reserve, when computing the break-up value of shares for wealth-tax purposes. The court applied the earlier principle that a properly valued gratuity provision reflects the discounted present value of the assessee&#039;s future obligation and is therefore deductible. The issue was answered in favour of treating the provision as a liability and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:48:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 13 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21632</link>
      <description>A gratuity provision based on scientific or actuarial valuation is treated as an existing liability, not a reserve, when computing the break-up value of shares for wealth-tax purposes. The court applied the earlier principle that a properly valued gratuity provision reflects the discounted present value of the assessee&#039;s future obligation and is therefore deductible. The issue was answered in favour of treating the provision as a liability and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>