https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286653 A claim for difference of pay and selection grade was treated as a computation of money due where the employee's entitlement had already accrued and the service records showed the factual basis for calculation, so the exercise fell within Section 33C(2) of the U.P. Industrial Dispute Act. The document also distinguishes liabilities under the U.P. Sugar Undertaking Acquisition Act, 1971 by the appointed day: pre-appointed-day dues remain recoverable under the statutory scheme and cannot be fastened on the transferee Corporation through labour adjudication, while post-appointed-day liabilities may be computed against it. The award therefore could not stand in full without separating the two periods. en-us Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286653 A claim for difference of pay and selection grade was treated as a computation of money due where the employee's entitlement had already accrued and the service records showed the factual basis for calculation, so the exercise fell within Section 33C(2) of the U.P. Industrial Dispute Act. The document also distinguishes liabilities under the U.P. Sugar Undertaking Acquisition Act, 1971 by the appointed day: pre-appointed-day dues remain recoverable under the statutory scheme and cannot be fastened on the transferee Corporation through labour adjudication, while post-appointed-day liabilities may be computed against it. The award therefore could not stand in full without separating the two periods. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286653