<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 361 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393217</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, confirming the validity of the satisfaction note recorded by the Assessing Officer under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act. The court held that when the same AO handles both the searched person and the third party, a single satisfaction note is adequate. The appeals were dismissed, with directions for the ITAT to decide the appeals afresh based on the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 361 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393217</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, confirming the validity of the satisfaction note recorded by the Assessing Officer under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act. The court held that when the same AO handles both the searched person and the third party, a single satisfaction note is adequate. The appeals were dismissed, with directions for the ITAT to decide the appeals afresh based on the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>