https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393209 The exemption application was allowed, and the writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 19 November 2019 resulted in the withdrawal of prayers (b) and (c) from the petition. The constitutionality of provisions of the CGST Act and Rules was challenged, but prayers related to this issue were withdrawn. The petitioner was directed to deposit 50% of the principal profiteered amount in two equal monthly installments, to be kept in interest-bearing Fixed Deposit Receipts by the Registry, with further proceedings scheduled for April 21, 2020. en-us Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 15:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393209 The exemption application was allowed, and the writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 19 November 2019 resulted in the withdrawal of prayers (b) and (c) from the petition. The constitutionality of provisions of the CGST Act and Rules was challenged, but prayers related to this issue were withdrawn. The petitioner was directed to deposit 50% of the principal profiteered amount in two equal monthly installments, to be kept in interest-bearing Fixed Deposit Receipts by the Registry, with further proceedings scheduled for April 21, 2020. Case-Laws GST Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393209