<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 351 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393207</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the petitioner, a service provider, to respond to GST payment notices and further examine contractual terms and legal obligations. The Court emphasized the importance of all parties presenting their arguments and instructed the respondent to make a decision within a specified timeline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 16:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 351 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393207</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the petitioner, a service provider, to respond to GST payment notices and further examine contractual terms and legal obligations. The Court emphasized the importance of all parties presenting their arguments and instructed the respondent to make a decision within a specified timeline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>