<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 14 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21628</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, interpreting section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court ruled that the disallowance of interest should be based on the net amount after setting off interest paid by partners to the firm, following the principle of mutuality in interest transactions between a firm and its partners. This decision aligned with a Supreme Court ruling and rejected a contrary view from the Madras High Court. The judgment favored the assessee, answering the reference question affirmatively and against the Revenue, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:35:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 14 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21628</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, interpreting section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court ruled that the disallowance of interest should be based on the net amount after setting off interest paid by partners to the firm, following the principle of mutuality in interest transactions between a firm and its partners. This decision aligned with a Supreme Court ruling and rejected a contrary view from the Madras High Court. The judgment favored the assessee, answering the reference question affirmatively and against the Revenue, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>