<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 346 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393202</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the respondent-assessee on both substantial questions of law. It held that TDS was not required for commission payments to foreign agents under Section 40(a)(ia) and upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision that the commission was wholly and exclusively for business purposes under Section 37. No costs were ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 346 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393202</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the respondent-assessee on both substantial questions of law. It held that TDS was not required for commission payments to foreign agents under Section 40(a)(ia) and upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision that the commission was wholly and exclusively for business purposes under Section 37. No costs were ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>