<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 68 Addition Overruled: Assessee Proves Genuine Share Application Money with Documentary Evidence, AO&#039;s Claim Dismissed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52219</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 68 - allegation that bogus share application money received from various paper companies - Addition made by the AO based on the statement of alleged entry provider which was recorded by the Investigation Wing, Mumbai was not found sustainable when the assessee produced all the documentary evidences to discharge its onus to prove the transaction - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2020 10:36:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2020 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 68 Addition Overruled: Assessee Proves Genuine Share Application Money with Documentary Evidence, AO&#039;s Claim Dismissed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52219</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 68 - allegation that bogus share application money received from various paper companies - Addition made by the AO based on the statement of alleged entry provider which was recorded by the Investigation Wing, Mumbai was not found sustainable when the assessee produced all the documentary evidences to discharge its onus to prove the transaction - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2020 10:36:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=52219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>