https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393182 The High Court of Allahabad held that the writ petition challenging a provisional order by the Additional Customs Officer was not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court emphasized the availability of an alternative remedy through an appeal under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appeal route for relief, with instructions to submit an application for the release of the vehicle along with the appeal. The Court's decision clarified the legal recourse and provided a structured approach for addressing the issue within the Customs Act, 1962. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Mar 2020 09:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393182 The High Court of Allahabad held that the writ petition challenging a provisional order by the Additional Customs Officer was not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court emphasized the availability of an alternative remedy through an appeal under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appeal route for relief, with instructions to submit an application for the release of the vehicle along with the appeal. The Court's decision clarified the legal recourse and provided a structured approach for addressing the issue within the Customs Act, 1962. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393182