<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 321 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393177</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, by extending the benefit of Section 80. However, it upheld the service tax demand and interest. The penalty under Section 77 for non-filing of ST3 returns was not disturbed, providing consequential reliefs as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 321 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393177</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, by extending the benefit of Section 80. However, it upheld the service tax demand and interest. The penalty under Section 77 for non-filing of ST3 returns was not disturbed, providing consequential reliefs as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>