<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (6) TMI 21 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21623</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income for the assessment year 1976-77. The Court rejected the assessee&#039;s argument that the penalty should not apply due to an agreement with the Revenue, emphasizing the lack of a clear agreement to waive the penalty. The Court determined that the assessment was not based on any concession by the assessee and upheld the imposition of the penalty in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:22:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (6) TMI 21 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21623</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income for the assessment year 1976-77. The Court rejected the assessee&#039;s argument that the penalty should not apply due to an agreement with the Revenue, emphasizing the lack of a clear agreement to waive the penalty. The Court determined that the assessment was not based on any concession by the assessee and upheld the imposition of the penalty in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>