<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 302 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393158</link>
    <description>An arbitration clause stating that disputes will be administered in Hong Kong and that the place of arbitration shall be Hong Kong ordinarily fixes Hong Kong as the juridical seat. On that reading, the arbitral process is governed by the law of the seat and supervisory jurisdiction lies with the courts of that place, so Indian courts do not have jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) for a foreign-seated international commercial arbitration. The separate reference to Indian law, New Delhi courts, and interim relief in another clause does not alter the seat or confer Section 11 jurisdiction where the clause, read as a whole, points to a foreign seat.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 302 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393158</link>
      <description>An arbitration clause stating that disputes will be administered in Hong Kong and that the place of arbitration shall be Hong Kong ordinarily fixes Hong Kong as the juridical seat. On that reading, the arbitral process is governed by the law of the seat and supervisory jurisdiction lies with the courts of that place, so Indian courts do not have jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) for a foreign-seated international commercial arbitration. The separate reference to Indian law, New Delhi courts, and interim relief in another clause does not alter the seat or confer Section 11 jurisdiction where the clause, read as a whole, points to a foreign seat.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>