<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1815 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286639</link>
    <description>Export duty demand on iron ore was held unsustainable where the Central Revenue Control Laboratory report showed iron content below 62%, the exemption threshold under Notification No. 62/2007-CUS. The Tribunal accepted the CRCL report as the final departmental appellate laboratory report and treated a later test from another laboratory as unreliable because it was obtained without recorded justification or prior intimation to the assessee, raising natural justice concerns. On the evidence as a whole, the Tribunal found the material predominantly supported iron content below the threshold and saw no reason to disturb that reasoned factual appreciation, so the revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2020 06:55:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1815 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286639</link>
      <description>Export duty demand on iron ore was held unsustainable where the Central Revenue Control Laboratory report showed iron content below 62%, the exemption threshold under Notification No. 62/2007-CUS. The Tribunal accepted the CRCL report as the final departmental appellate laboratory report and treated a later test from another laboratory as unreliable because it was obtained without recorded justification or prior intimation to the assessee, raising natural justice concerns. On the evidence as a whole, the Tribunal found the material predominantly supported iron content below the threshold and saw no reason to disturb that reasoned factual appreciation, so the revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>