<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 296 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393152</link>
    <description>The application filed by PHFMS was rejected under Proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST/TNGST Act as the question raised was already pending in the Hon&#039;ble Madras High Court. The court had allowed the Advance Ruling Authority to decide on the application despite the pending writ petition. However, the authority found that the issue of GST applicability was central to the writ petition, and thus, the application could not be admitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 16:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 296 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393152</link>
      <description>The application filed by PHFMS was rejected under Proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST/TNGST Act as the question raised was already pending in the Hon&#039;ble Madras High Court. The court had allowed the Advance Ruling Authority to decide on the application despite the pending writ petition. However, the authority found that the issue of GST applicability was central to the writ petition, and thus, the application could not be admitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>