<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 291 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393147</link>
    <description>Writ review in tender disputes remains limited where the tender framework provides a statutory appeal and the challenge is brought before the process is complete. The Court treated the petitions as premature because the appellate remedy under the Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act had not been invoked, and declined to entertain the challenge. It also refused to re-examine the tender accepting authority&#039;s GST assessment or financial bid evaluation, holding that interference is confined to arbitrariness, irrationality, mala fides, bias, or perversity. No basis was found to reject the successful bidder&#039;s bid, and the challenge to the tender process failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 15:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 291 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393147</link>
      <description>Writ review in tender disputes remains limited where the tender framework provides a statutory appeal and the challenge is brought before the process is complete. The Court treated the petitions as premature because the appellate remedy under the Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act had not been invoked, and declined to entertain the challenge. It also refused to re-examine the tender accepting authority&#039;s GST assessment or financial bid evaluation, holding that interference is confined to arbitrariness, irrationality, mala fides, bias, or perversity. No basis was found to reject the successful bidder&#039;s bid, and the challenge to the tender process failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>