<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 288 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393144</link>
    <description>The authority found that the respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under GST to buyers, resulting in a profiteered amount of Rs. 22,59,91,979. The respondent was directed to pass on this amount to buyers with interest and reduce flat prices accordingly. A penalty notice was issued for contravention of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. Compliance monitoring was ordered, and the respondent was given three months to comply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 288 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393144</link>
      <description>The authority found that the respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under GST to buyers, resulting in a profiteered amount of Rs. 22,59,91,979. The respondent was directed to pass on this amount to buyers with interest and reduce flat prices accordingly. A penalty notice was issued for contravention of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. Compliance monitoring was ordered, and the respondent was given three months to comply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>