<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 287 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393143</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the transfer order under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the transfer complied with procedural requirements, providing the petitioner with an opportunity to object and communicating reasons adequately. The court noted the delay in challenging the order and found no merit in other grounds raised by the petitioner. The petition was dismissed without costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 287 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393143</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the transfer order under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the transfer complied with procedural requirements, providing the petitioner with an opportunity to object and communicating reasons adequately. The court noted the delay in challenging the order and found no merit in other grounds raised by the petitioner. The petition was dismissed without costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>