<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 286 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393142</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the revenue, determining that interest paid for delay in share allotment is capital expenditure, not revenue expenditure. The Court also held that prior period expenditure should not be deducted from book profits for tax purposes under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the Court quashed the decisions of lower authorities and allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 286 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393142</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the revenue, determining that interest paid for delay in share allotment is capital expenditure, not revenue expenditure. The Court also held that prior period expenditure should not be deducted from book profits for tax purposes under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the Court quashed the decisions of lower authorities and allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>