<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 58 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21615</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to refuse continuation of registration for a partnership firm based on its genuineness. It emphasized the independence of sections 184, 185, and 186 of the Income-tax Act, allowing cancellation of registration under section 186(1) even if granted earlier. Each assessment year requires independent establishment of the firm&#039;s genuineness. The court found no illegality in canceling registration for the relevant years, supporting the Tribunal&#039;s decision. Respondents were awarded costs, and the decisions regarding cancellation of registration were affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:47:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 58 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21615</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to refuse continuation of registration for a partnership firm based on its genuineness. It emphasized the independence of sections 184, 185, and 186 of the Income-tax Act, allowing cancellation of registration under section 186(1) even if granted earlier. Each assessment year requires independent establishment of the firm&#039;s genuineness. The court found no illegality in canceling registration for the relevant years, supporting the Tribunal&#039;s decision. Respondents were awarded costs, and the decisions regarding cancellation of registration were affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>