<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 283 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393139</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that initiating penalty under section 271(1)(c) and subsequently proceeding with penalty under section 271AAA was incorrect. They determined that penalties under these sections are mutually exclusive, and once penalty proceedings start under section 271(1)(c), imposing penalty under section 271AAA is impermissible. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed under section 271AAA, ruling in favor of the assessees in both cases with identical facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 283 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393139</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that initiating penalty under section 271(1)(c) and subsequently proceeding with penalty under section 271AAA was incorrect. They determined that penalties under these sections are mutually exclusive, and once penalty proceedings start under section 271(1)(c), imposing penalty under section 271AAA is impermissible. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed under section 271AAA, ruling in favor of the assessees in both cases with identical facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>