<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 282 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393138</link>
    <description>In the case for Assessment Year 2006-07, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to adopt the income at Rs. 1,87,524, partly allowing the appeal. For Assessment Year 2007-08, the Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s approach substantially correct, determining the income at Rs. 7,11,694. Both appeals were partly allowed, with the final income determinations made on 04/03/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 282 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393138</link>
      <description>In the case for Assessment Year 2006-07, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to adopt the income at Rs. 1,87,524, partly allowing the appeal. For Assessment Year 2007-08, the Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s approach substantially correct, determining the income at Rs. 7,11,694. Both appeals were partly allowed, with the final income determinations made on 04/03/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>