https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393129 The HC quashed the sixth respondent's decision denying MEIS benefits for 44 shipping bills due to an omission in the declaration. The court directed the third and fourth respondents to issue a no objection certificate within three weeks, allowing the petitioner to claim MEIS benefits from DGFT, contingent upon proving the authenticity of the shipping bills. The fifth respondent must then pass incentive orders within three weeks. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. en-us Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Nov 2024 13:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393129 The HC quashed the sixth respondent's decision denying MEIS benefits for 44 shipping bills due to an omission in the declaration. The court directed the third and fourth respondents to issue a no objection certificate within three weeks, allowing the petitioner to claim MEIS benefits from DGFT, contingent upon proving the authenticity of the shipping bills. The fifth respondent must then pass incentive orders within three weeks. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393129