<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 272 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393128</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant is liable to pay duty at the rate prevailing at the time of debonding for both imported and indigenously procured capital goods. It was determined that no interest is payable by the appellant based on the exemption provided in Notification No. 132/2004-Cus (NT). The final order directs the Revenue to calculate the duty accordingly, with payment required within one month, resulting in the disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 272 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393128</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant is liable to pay duty at the rate prevailing at the time of debonding for both imported and indigenously procured capital goods. It was determined that no interest is payable by the appellant based on the exemption provided in Notification No. 132/2004-Cus (NT). The final order directs the Revenue to calculate the duty accordingly, with payment required within one month, resulting in the disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>