<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 62 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21612</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, a private limited company, regarding the assessment of lease rent as business income under the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 1977-78 and 1978-79. The Tribunal found that since the lease rent was collected by the vendee after possession was handed over, it could not be considered as the assessee&#039;s business income under section 28. The judgment clarified the distinction between income assessable under the head &quot;Property&quot; and business income, emphasizing that until ownership of property was transferred by execution and registration of a sale deed, the lease rent could not be assessed as business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:41:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 62 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21612</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, a private limited company, regarding the assessment of lease rent as business income under the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 1977-78 and 1978-79. The Tribunal found that since the lease rent was collected by the vendee after possession was handed over, it could not be considered as the assessee&#039;s business income under section 28. The judgment clarified the distinction between income assessable under the head &quot;Property&quot; and business income, emphasizing that until ownership of property was transferred by execution and registration of a sale deed, the lease rent could not be assessed as business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>