<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 255 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393111</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside both impugned orders and remanded the cases to the Original Authority for de novo adjudication. The Original Authority was directed to afford the appellant the opportunity for cross-examination of witnesses and to comply with the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal also instructed the Original Authority to reconsider the issues of excisability, marketability, and calculation of CENVAT credit in light of the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 255 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393111</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside both impugned orders and remanded the cases to the Original Authority for de novo adjudication. The Original Authority was directed to afford the appellant the opportunity for cross-examination of witnesses and to comply with the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal also instructed the Original Authority to reconsider the issues of excisability, marketability, and calculation of CENVAT credit in light of the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>