https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286623 The Supreme Court held that the appellant was not disqualified for blacklisting as the show cause notice did not equate to blacklisting initiation. The Court emphasized that blacklisting should not be presumed from a mere notice. Regarding the Business Continuity Certificate, the Court ruled that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by questioning its validity. The Court stressed that such matters should be left to the tendering authority's discretion. Additionally, the Court highlighted that the interpretation of tender terms should be left to the tendering authority unless there is evidence of arbitrariness. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order, upheld the appellant's contract, and dismissed the writ petition. en-us Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jul 2022 11:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286623 The Supreme Court held that the appellant was not disqualified for blacklisting as the show cause notice did not equate to blacklisting initiation. The Court emphasized that blacklisting should not be presumed from a mere notice. Regarding the Business Continuity Certificate, the Court ruled that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by questioning its validity. The Court stressed that such matters should be left to the tendering authority's discretion. Additionally, the Court highlighted that the interpretation of tender terms should be left to the tendering authority unless there is evidence of arbitrariness. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order, upheld the appellant's contract, and dismissed the writ petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286623