<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 237 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393093</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, due to allegations under Section 69 read with Section 132(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner&#039;s arguments regarding lack of notice under Section 73 of the CGST Act and prosecution sanction under Section 134 were considered. Health concerns of the petitioner were noted, but the court emphasized the gravity of economic offenses and the need to deter such crimes. The petitioner was advised to approach the authority for compounding the offense under Section 138 of the CGST Act, and release was permitted upon depositing a portion of the evaded amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 237 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393093</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, due to allegations under Section 69 read with Section 132(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner&#039;s arguments regarding lack of notice under Section 73 of the CGST Act and prosecution sanction under Section 134 were considered. Health concerns of the petitioner were noted, but the court emphasized the gravity of economic offenses and the need to deter such crimes. The petitioner was advised to approach the authority for compounding the offense under Section 138 of the CGST Act, and release was permitted upon depositing a portion of the evaded amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>