<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 237 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393093</link>
    <description>Bail in a CGST prosecution was declined where the allegations involved issuance of GST invoices without supply of goods or services, the investigation had already been completed, and the Court treated the offence as a serious economic one. The Court reiterated that the CGST regime does not create an absolute bar on arrest or custodial action, and that long incarceration alone does not require release on bail. It also noted the availability of compounding under the statutory scheme, with liberty to seek relief before the competent authority on deposit of a stated percentage of the evaded amount. Bail was refused at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 237 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393093</link>
      <description>Bail in a CGST prosecution was declined where the allegations involved issuance of GST invoices without supply of goods or services, the investigation had already been completed, and the Court treated the offence as a serious economic one. The Court reiterated that the CGST regime does not create an absolute bar on arrest or custodial action, and that long incarceration alone does not require release on bail. It also noted the availability of compounding under the statutory scheme, with liberty to seek relief before the competent authority on deposit of a stated percentage of the evaded amount. Bail was refused at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>