<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 227 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393083</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 2,29,28,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. This decision was based on insufficient inquiry and lack of evidence by the Assessing Officer. The disallowance of Rs. 30,887 under Section 14A was dismissed as the assessee did not pursue this ground during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 14:23:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 227 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393083</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 2,29,28,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. This decision was based on insufficient inquiry and lack of evidence by the Assessing Officer. The disallowance of Rs. 30,887 under Section 14A was dismissed as the assessee did not pursue this ground during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>