<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 10 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21602</link>
    <description>Transfer of an electrical undertaking as a going concern was treated as transfer of a capital asset, so the consideration was brought within capital gains computation and solatium was included in the consideration. Gratuity liability on mercantile accounting was held to accrue when the statutory liability arose, so a later assessment year could not claim the deduction. Retrenchment compensation, however, arose from notices issued while the business was still being carried on and was later quantified by settlement, making it allowable as business expenditure and, alternatively, deductible against the compensation received.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:46:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 10 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21602</link>
      <description>Transfer of an electrical undertaking as a going concern was treated as transfer of a capital asset, so the consideration was brought within capital gains computation and solatium was included in the consideration. Gratuity liability on mercantile accounting was held to accrue when the statutory liability arose, so a later assessment year could not claim the deduction. Retrenchment compensation, however, arose from notices issued while the business was still being carried on and was later quantified by settlement, making it allowable as business expenditure and, alternatively, deductible against the compensation received.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>