<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 220 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393076</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the excise duty refund and interest subsidy were capital receipts, not taxable under normal provisions, and should not be included in book profits under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal reversed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s orders, restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s original assessments for the relevant years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 13:28:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 220 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393076</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the excise duty refund and interest subsidy were capital receipts, not taxable under normal provisions, and should not be included in book profits under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal reversed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s orders, restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s original assessments for the relevant years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>