<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 218 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash proceedings under section 153C due to defective satisfaction notes and improper jurisdiction assumption. The Tribunal affirmed that the seized documents were photocopies and the AO lacked necessary satisfaction regarding ownership. Consequently, the CIT(A)&#039;s order was deemed correct, and no decision on the case&#039;s merits was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 13:27:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=606006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 218 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash proceedings under section 153C due to defective satisfaction notes and improper jurisdiction assumption. The Tribunal affirmed that the seized documents were photocopies and the AO lacked necessary satisfaction regarding ownership. Consequently, the CIT(A)&#039;s order was deemed correct, and no decision on the case&#039;s merits was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>