<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 8 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21601</link>
    <description>Processing prawns was treated as production of articles, so the activity qualified as an industrial undertaking for relief under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The High Court followed its earlier binding view in the assessee&#039;s own case and the connected precedent on the same activity. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s entire business income was held eligible for section 80J relief, and the referred question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:44:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 8 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21601</link>
      <description>Processing prawns was treated as production of articles, so the activity qualified as an industrial undertaking for relief under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The High Court followed its earlier binding view in the assessee&#039;s own case and the connected precedent on the same activity. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s entire business income was held eligible for section 80J relief, and the referred question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>