https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393065 The ITAT affirmed the addition of undisclosed receipts as income for A.Y. 2010-11, emphasizing the burden of proof on the appellant to establish non-taxability. The appellant's request for rectification was dismissed due to lack of supporting evidence. The ITAT rejected the appellant's proposal to tax only 8% of the undisclosed receipt, as it sought a review of the upheld order. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 15.1.2020, underscoring legal complexities in rectification, burden of proof, and review under the I.T. Act. en-us Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Mar 2020 12:07:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393065 The ITAT affirmed the addition of undisclosed receipts as income for A.Y. 2010-11, emphasizing the burden of proof on the appellant to establish non-taxability. The appellant's request for rectification was dismissed due to lack of supporting evidence. The ITAT rejected the appellant's proposal to tax only 8% of the undisclosed receipt, as it sought a review of the upheld order. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 15.1.2020, underscoring legal complexities in rectification, burden of proof, and review under the I.T. Act. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393065