<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 198 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393054</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for the normal period of limitation but set aside the demand for the extended period and the penalties imposed. The case was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for the limited purpose of re-computation of duty, considering the amounts collected as VAT as cum-duty price. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced in open court on 02/03/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 10:31:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 198 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393054</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for the normal period of limitation but set aside the demand for the extended period and the penalties imposed. The case was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for the limited purpose of re-computation of duty, considering the amounts collected as VAT as cum-duty price. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced in open court on 02/03/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>