<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 194 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393050</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the orders of the Tribunal and lower authorities, ruling in favor of the revisionist. It emphasized the lack of concrete evidence to support tax imposition and the importance of verifiable evidence in tax assessments. The Court found that the transaction in question lacked reliable evidence and that tax liability cannot be solely based on a single document, especially when the other party denied the transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 10:23:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 194 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393050</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the orders of the Tribunal and lower authorities, ruling in favor of the revisionist. It emphasized the lack of concrete evidence to support tax imposition and the importance of verifiable evidence in tax assessments. The Court found that the transaction in question lacked reliable evidence and that tax liability cannot be solely based on a single document, especially when the other party denied the transaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>