<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 191 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393047</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the Sessions Court&#039;s acquittal. The respondent was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, with a fine of Rs. 10,50,000 imposed, along with 6% interest per annum on the amount advanced by the appellant. The judgment emphasized the significance of evidence, legal presumptions, and the burden of proof in cases concerning dishonored cheques.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 10:20:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 191 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393047</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the Sessions Court&#039;s acquittal. The respondent was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, with a fine of Rs. 10,50,000 imposed, along with 6% interest per annum on the amount advanced by the appellant. The judgment emphasized the significance of evidence, legal presumptions, and the burden of proof in cases concerning dishonored cheques.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>