<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 595 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286599</link>
    <description>Successive bail applications cannot be entertained on the same material merely because res judicata does not strictly apply to bail. Where earlier refusals of bail have been sustained and no substantial change in circumstances is shown, a fresh grant of bail is unsustainable, especially when serious allegations and witness interference concerns remain relevant. The reasons recorded for departing from the earlier orders did not justify a different view, so the bail order was set aside and custody was directed forthwith.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 595 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286599</link>
      <description>Successive bail applications cannot be entertained on the same material merely because res judicata does not strictly apply to bail. Where earlier refusals of bail have been sustained and no substantial change in circumstances is shown, a fresh grant of bail is unsustainable, especially when serious allegations and witness interference concerns remain relevant. The reasons recorded for departing from the earlier orders did not justify a different view, so the bail order was set aside and custody was directed forthwith.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>