<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1790 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286590</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by setting aside the revocation of the Customs Broker Licence but upheld the penalty of Rs. 50,000 imposed under the Customs Broker Licencing Regulations. The decision emphasized the importance of advising importers appropriately and complying with regulatory requirements, stressing the need for customs brokers to exercise due diligence in ensuring compliance with prescribed formats and procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:59:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1790 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286590</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by setting aside the revocation of the Customs Broker Licence but upheld the penalty of Rs. 50,000 imposed under the Customs Broker Licencing Regulations. The decision emphasized the importance of advising importers appropriately and complying with regulatory requirements, stressing the need for customs brokers to exercise due diligence in ensuring compliance with prescribed formats and procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>