<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1879 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286594</link>
    <description>The rebate claims filed by the applicant for duty paid export of goods were rejected as time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision, determining that the claims were filed after the expiration of one year from the export of goods, making them ineligible. Despite the applicant&#039;s argument regarding provisional assessment, it was established that no such assessment had taken place in this case. The relevant date for counting the limitation period remained the date of export. Consequently, the revision application was rejected, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:59:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1879 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286594</link>
      <description>The rebate claims filed by the applicant for duty paid export of goods were rejected as time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision, determining that the claims were filed after the expiration of one year from the export of goods, making them ineligible. Despite the applicant&#039;s argument regarding provisional assessment, it was established that no such assessment had taken place in this case. The relevant date for counting the limitation period remained the date of export. Consequently, the revision application was rejected, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>