<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 11 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21595</link>
    <description>A will was construed as conferring absolute and unfettered rights over the mill properties on the widow, including sole proprietorship of the mills and exclusion of any sons&#039; rights during her lifetime. Restrictive words against disposal or partition were treated as insufficient to narrow the clear absolute gift. On that basis, the deceased&#039;s interest in the property ceased on death, and because that interest extended to the whole income from the mills, the full mill assets were said to fall within the dutiable estate under the estate duty provisions. The view that only a one-eighth share was includible was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:27:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 11 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21595</link>
      <description>A will was construed as conferring absolute and unfettered rights over the mill properties on the widow, including sole proprietorship of the mills and exclusion of any sons&#039; rights during her lifetime. Restrictive words against disposal or partition were treated as insufficient to narrow the clear absolute gift. On that basis, the deceased&#039;s interest in the property ceased on death, and because that interest extended to the whole income from the mills, the full mill assets were said to fall within the dutiable estate under the estate duty provisions. The view that only a one-eighth share was includible was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>