<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 187 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393043</link>
    <description>The Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a penalty order for lack of reasonable opportunity of hearing. The Court noted the availability of an appeal remedy under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, and declined to entertain the petition, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies before seeking judicial intervention. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the appeal as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 187 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393043</link>
      <description>The Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a penalty order for lack of reasonable opportunity of hearing. The Court noted the availability of an appeal remedy under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, and declined to entertain the petition, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies before seeking judicial intervention. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the appeal as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=393043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>