<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1198 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286575</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the transmission and wheeling charges paid by the Assessee do not attract the provisions of deduction of tax under section 194J but should be deducted at 2% under section 194C. The Assessee was not considered in default for non-deduction of TDS. The payment for transmission charges was not classified as rent under section 194I. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:25:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=605897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1198 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286575</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the transmission and wheeling charges paid by the Assessee do not attract the provisions of deduction of tax under section 194J but should be deducted at 2% under section 194C. The Assessee was not considered in default for non-deduction of TDS. The payment for transmission charges was not classified as rent under section 194I. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>